|
|
The nd Panel of the Superior Labor Court exempted an employee from Mandirituba (PR) from paying the procedural costs arising from the filing of his labor complaint after failing to attend the inaugural hearing. Dollar Photo Club Dollar Photo Club Employee who missed the hearing does not need to pay court costs, TST decides The ministers considered that the complaint was filed before the Labor Reform came into force, when the rules provided for exemption from payment of costs in the event of the case being closed due to the absence of the worker benefiting from free justice, as in this case. The employee filed a labor complaint in August against three companies in the same group, but missed the initial hearing scheduled for Given his unjustified absence, the court ordered the case to be closed and the procedural costs to be paid, in the amount of R$ The Regional Labor Court of the th Region maintained the sentence, with the understanding that the provision for payment of costs for non-attendance applies to hearings held from, the date on which the Labor Reform came into force. The rapporteur of the servant's review appeal, Delaíde Miranda Arantes, pointed out that, according to Normative Instruction of the TST, article , paragraph , of the CLT, as amended by Law only if applies to processes initiated after the new law came into force, on
“Considering that the Greece Phone Number complaint was filed on the previous rule prevails”, he concluded. The decision was unanimous. With information from the TST press office.For example, this year Brazil has to send memorials information about Conventions and . The choice of cases for the "short list" is not made by the ILO, and the absence of a particular case on the list does not mean that there are no violations, or that it is not serious. As this is a negotiation process, the parties prioritize their choices according to their own criteria. Within this dynamic, the "Brazil case" provided space for violations of the most basic human rights, such as life, which are occurring in Colombia and Honduras, to be the subject of international debate and scrutiny. The fact that Brazil is not included on the CAN "short list" of cases only means that the debate has been postponed to future CITs. The inadequacy of Law , with ILO Conventions and remains unquestionable. It is enough to bring up that the CAN Committee of Experts has repeatedly stated, since , that "the general objective of Conventions Nos. , and is the promotion of collective negotiation to find an agreement on terms and conditions of work that are more favorable than those foreseen in the legislation (see General Study of , Collective negotiation in public administration: A path forward, paragraph ).
Improving the protection of workers provided by legislation is included in the preparatory work of Convention No. , an instrument that has the purpose, as specified in its Preamble, of contributing to the achievement of the objectives set by Convention No. In these preparatory discussions it was considered that it was not necessary to explain in the new agreement the general principle according to which collective negotiation should not have as an effect the establishment of less favorable conditions of those established by law — the tripartite committee of the Conference established to forward the agreement project I considered that it was clear and that, therefore, it was not necessary to include an explicit mention in this regard" [] . Apart from this class on Collective Negotiation, the CAN Experts have also repeatedly expressed themselves in the sense that Brazil must, together with representatives of workers and employers, review Article -A of the CLT to adapt it to the Conventions and It is up to workers, through their organizations, to vocalize what is best for them, what is negotiable, and what cannot be given up. The Labor Reform did not help unions to be more representative and legitimate, if that was their intention.
|
|
發表於 16:57:14